At 03:27 PM 2/7/2009, you wrote:
[MP]
> While MoQ'ers may believe that MoQ has no place for God, god or even g*d,
> it
> is not a very practical means of evolution even if infallible. The first
> human to
> have the intellectual DQ spark that led to society would not have been
> worth her
> weight in salt had she refused to work with those who hadn't yet had such
> a
> spark. I'd wager she interacted with them in ways that led them to
> innately
> recognize the worth of her DQ event rather than present them with a "my
> way or
> the highway" ultimatum.
Good point. Such ultimatums also come from those who claim there is only
one right way to think.
Platt
Platt,
Just for the record there are as many ways to think as there are
individual collections of of interrelated and interconnected,
inorganic, biological, social and intellectual, static patterns of
value responding to Dynamic Quality. But this collection does not
accept God, g*d, theism, or th*ism. And if Micheal cannot accept
that, I will not waste his time or bother him.
Marsha
.
_____________
Science does not know its debt to imagination. ~Ralph Waldo Emerson
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
