MP,
Which definition comes closest to your position on theism?
It stikes me as pantheistic in relation to MoQ.
 
Theism, in its most inclusive usage, is the belief in at least one deity.[1][2] 
Less inclusive usages specify that the deity believed in be a distinct 
identifiable entity, thereby contrasted with pantheism. Other narrower usages 
specify a specific doctrine concerning the nature of the deity believed in, 
such that it be a single supreme transcendent God that remains an active, 
immanent force in the universe.[3][Request quotation on talk to verify] This 
more specific use of the word theism arose in the 18th century[citation needed] 
to contrast with the then-widely-held deism which contended that a creator 
deity—though transcendent and supreme—did not intervene in the natural world 
and could be known rationally but not via revelation.

A deity is a postulated preternatural or supernatural immortal being, who may 
be thought of as holy, divine, or sacred, held in high regard, and respected by 
human beings.
 
Deism is a religious and philosophical belief that a supreme natural God exists 
and created the physical universe, and that religious truths can be arrived at 
by the application of reason and observation of the natural world. Deists 
generally reject the notion of supernatural revelation as a basis of truth or 
religious dogma. These views contrast with the dependence on divine revelation 
found in many Christian,[1] Islamic and Judaic teachings.-wiki

Deism is the belief that a god or gods exists, created the world, but does/do 
not alter the original plan for the universe.[8] It typically rejects 
supernatural events (prophecy, miracles) and divine revelation prominent in 
organized religion, along with holy books and revealed religions that assert 
the existence of such things. Instead, Deism holds that religious beliefs must 
be founded on human reason and observed features of the natural world, and that 
these sources reveal the existence of a supreme being as creator.


Pantheism (Greek: πάν ( 'pan' ) = all and θεός ( 'theos' ) = God, it literally 
means "God is All" and "All is God") is the view that everything is part of an 
all-encompassing immanent abstract God; or that the Universe, or nature, and 
God are equivalent. More detailed definitions tend to emphasize the idea that 
natural law, existence, and the Universe (the sum total of all that is, was, 
and shall be) is represented in the theological principle of an abstract 'god' 
rather than a personal, creative deity or deities of any kind. This is the key 
feature which distinguishes them from panentheists and pandeists. As such, 
although many religions may claim to hold pantheistic elements, they are more 
commonly panentheistic or pandeistic in nature.

Thanks
-Ron



________________________________
From: Michael Poloukhine <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, February 8, 2009 6:38:41 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Theism/epistemology

> Ron;
> Then if you?would, please define theism as you understand the
> term.

MP:
the-ism
-noun
1.     the belief in one God as the creator and ruler of the universe, without 
rejection of revelation (distinguished from deism ).
2.     belief in the existence of a god or gods (opposed to atheism ).

Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006. 

The second definition being the one I am on about, notably "as opposed to 
atheism" and the where the "god or gods" are absent any subsequent cultural 
layering or definition.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/



      
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to