> MP expounds on the meat of the subject: > My purpose is I think noble; it is to seek a way to integrate and evolve > cultural > understanding of God to a more MoQ harmonious level. I don't seek to re- > define MoQ to accept theism (in any definition) I seek to redefine theism to > accept MoQ. > > I think the difference is not semantic. > > > Ron; > If all theists thought as you, the world would be a much better > place, alas, most hold a book as THE true word of GOD and any thought > to the contrary is the work of satan.
MP: Ron, thank you for your honesty and patient persistence with this. Its refreshing. And "alas" indeed. However, If *I* as a theist can think this way, does that not allow for the possibility of others? I'm not special in that sense, no genius, no savant. Just thinking hard about what I believe and why. I will say though that if you think *my* hoe is tough to row, how will it be any easier to row trying to apply MoQ on a society where they can't even manage theism without botching it up? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
