[DMB] > Thanks to > the interdisciplinary nature of the Master's program I've been in for the > last several years, I've explained the MOQ in terms of pragmatism, > empiricism, mythology, psychology, mysticism, art, cultural evolution, > political conflict and religion. And what, by contrast, have you brought > to the table? As far as I can tell, nothing but a weird little pet theory > that doesn't make sense, that nobody in a position to know can agree with. > To be less than kind about it, this borders on the delusional. Thus, > you're freaking me out.
DMB identifies himself with those "in a position to know." Reminds me of those who appeal to "right thinking people." In formal logic such appeals are rightly called Argumentum ad Populum fallacies. To me it indicates a case of narcissism, a severe personality disorder. Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
