Krimel said:
What motivates your choices; fear of uncertainty or lust for precision?


[dmb says:]
Dewey, being naturalistic as he was, thought that the fear of uncertainty
was the intellectual equivalent of the organism's fear of insecurity or
desire for safety. This desire isn't crazy and we all feel it to some extent
but it can overwhelm us and in the case of philosophy it leads us to desire
what can never be had and that can make you a little crazy. 

[Krimel]
We are powerless in the face of uncertainty. Uncertainty is the capricious
face of Loki and Ananzi. It is the God who in Isaiah proclaims "I make good
and I make evil." It is the God who's answer to Job is: I fucked you over
because I am the master of the universe and I can. Uncertainty is the God
who says, "My thoughts are not your thoughts and my ways are not your ways."
Uncertainty is Shiva creator and destroyer of worlds. Uncertainty is pure
Dynamic Quality and it can zap you if you stand too close.

[dmb]
In fact, recent psychological research suggests that the relative strength
of this motive is what separates liberals from conservatives both
politically and in terms of religion. To make a long story short,
conservatives are more uncomfortable with uncertainty and so tend to adopt
absolutist positions to ease their discomfort. Looking at the present state
of the Republican party, this makes a great deal of sense. They've tended
support the excesses of the war on terror for the sake of physical safety
and the excesses of religious dogma for their "intellectual" security. I'd
add that this same split is observable in the choices people make at our
Universities and colleges. 

[Krimel]
I certainly encourage your reading of actual research. Nothing but good can
come of that for you.

[dmb]
I've heard more than one science and math student say he was drawn to such
fields because, unlike things like literature, history and the other
humanities, there is usually just one right answer. They like the precision
of science. It makes them feel safe and certain, intellectually speaking.
The professor of philosophy who teaches my Plato class was saying last time
how he sees this same discomfort with uncertainties among  the business
students, who are "forced" to take an ethics class in the philosophy
department. They don't want to engage with the ideas or otherwise think
about it too much. They just want the final answer, the correct answer. Ha!
As if there were one. 

[Krimel]
I think that uncertainty is not the least bit less in science and math. It
is just that the criteria for resolving it are clearer. Bohr's distinction
between clarity and precision comes to mind. In the Romantic mode we achieve
clarity. In the Classical mode we achieve precision. They are both means of
reducing our sense of powerlessness in the face of the unknown and
unknowable. But like Tony Stark, I ask, "Why should we have to choose?"
Don't we get the best of both worlds when they are in harmony? Isn't harmony
to be found in The Way. Doesn't, in fact, harmony _show_ us The Way?

[dmb]
My point? The rear of uncertainty and the lust for precision are more or
less the same thing, two sides of the same coin and they can be quite
intellectually crippling. In Buddhism they say that fear and desire is the
cause of all suffering. I suppose that applies socially and intellectually
every bit as much as it applies to the appetites of the flesh. 

[Krimel]
The Buddhists say that what causes our sense of powerlessness in the face of
uncertainty, is desire. 
Christian's handle uncertainty through submission to divine will. 
You know, the Serenity Prayer? 

William James would say that these claims are functionally equivalent
responses to Uncertainty. I would say they both perpetuate Myths of Control.

But, of course, you are right; these different orientations toward the
problem produce different world views.

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to