[Krimel]
That said, exactly where in what I actually said do you find error?

Andre:
In your misconstruction through lack of understanding Krimel. And this has
come about through the arrogant and condescending way of interpreting and
understanding 'Oriental culture' (whatever you mean by this).To do this from
a theistic ( I presume Christian) perspective, I think is what annoyed me
most.

[Krimel]
I understand that you are annoyed but other than, you don't like my spin on
the issue, I don't see where you think I have misunderstood the broad
outline of eastern philosophy or culture.

Krimel said:
Are you saying that Buddhism does not advocate passivity and the elimination
of desire? Are you saying that Hinduism and Buddhism do not aim towards
escape from the cycle of death and rebirth?

Andre:
'Passivity' and 'elimination of desire', 'escape of the cycle of death and
rebirth' are only snippets of a fairly complex philosophy of living, upon
which I cannot expand in this forum. (If you are genuinly interested I can
recommend some literature). First and foremost they strive for compassion, a
word which is almost outdated here in the West. And if you do use it
...people will look at you stange as though saying: 'Something wrong with
you?'

I am not an expert either and therefore do not criticise what I do not
understand.( Remember Dylan?)

[Krimel]
If you have something that suggests that compassion is somehow an end run
around the eight noble truths and that the "desire" for compassion is exempt
from the renunciation of desire, ok. But are you seriously trying to tell me
that renunciation of desire and escape from the cycle of rebirth are NOT
fundamental to oriental philosophy because if you are I might have a few
readings to suggest to you as well.

[Andre]
The other thing that annoyed me Krimel, is that I have worked and lived in
'The Orient" for 3 years and have Buddhist friends there. They are very dear
to me and I am dear to them. These practitioners of the 'ism's ' you talk
about are very real people. They have their ups and downs, they have hopes
and dreams and their life is very difficult and at present are also
suffering from the financial crisis etc etc.

[Krimel]
So what? I have lots of Christian friends... fill in the blank. I am not
talking about your friends or my friends I am talking about the consequences
of certain beliefs.

[Andre]
They are human beings mate, just like you and me. They believe in their
things, you believe in yours.
I have never heard them speaking in an arrogant or condescending way about
Christianity or any other 'Western' religion.
When the topic is brought up they just smile and say; "Mm, interesting".

[Krimel]
I would suggest that anyone who cannot think of arrogant condescending
things to say about Christianity hasn't studied Christianity. Buddhism is
not immune. Neither is Hinduism or any other religion. Bo was simply voicing
the prevailing idea around here, that oriental philosophy is somehow more
profound than western philosophy. But I think that is because most of us are
familiar with western philosophy and familiarity breeds contempt. As a
result we are likely to give a pass to the ludicrous ideas endemic in other
systems of thought and to ignore their consequences.

I'll wash my mouth out when you provide a reason for me to apologize.

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to