[Platt] Surely you must know how to read. Again I suggest you read Lila. All your questions about DQ are answered in that book.
[Arlo] Nice try. Answer the question. YOU keep denigrating chance. YOU keep saying "it's not chance, it's DQ". What are the DISTINCTIONS? Or, if you prefer, kindly point out ONE passage in LILA you feel illustrates a distinction between "chance" and "DQ". Just one. Does your intellectual dishonesty really not make you ashamed? I mean, certainly even you are capable of seeing that you are doing nothing but embarrassing yourself here. But no matter. I know you are too much a coward to have this conversation. What's a shame is that you don't stop to ask yourself why you can't provide a single, solitary distinction. You can "boo hoo" here again "ad hominems", it matters not. You _want_ Qualigod, but you lack the balls to just be honest about it. You want "intent", but lack the brass to say it outright (and believe me, I understand why!). Sad, really. I'm reminded of Pirsig's talk in ZMM about the chairman, and if he really were interested in truth... but I'd wager that's just another opportunity for you to cry your "ad hominem" nonsense again. I'll just leave you with this. Ask yourself, why are you incapable or unwilling to offer even ONE distinction between "chance" and "DQ'? I'm sure we all know why, but maybe you should try just being honest with yourself. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
