If Platt really did say > [Platt] > In the deterministic world of science, chance is a measure of ignorance. When > a > scientist doesn't know what causes a certain effect, like mind emerging from > mud, the effect is attributed to chance... >
No, no, no, no, no, no. That could not be further from the truth, a measure of Platt's ignorance, whatever point Arlo was going on to make about DQ and God .... which I suspect I would agree with. Chance is a measure of knowledge, it is a clear understanding of exactly what can (and can't) be known. The very opposite of ignorance. Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
