On 15 Mar 2009 at 18:49, [email protected] wrote: > Ron: > To prove something may be to experience it. Perhaps this is the > meaning you miss.
MP: Ron, if this is the case then the whole discussion has come round to crash in on itself. Arlo initially questioned the belief in God as nothing more than equal to a belief in Leprechauns because there's no way to prove either. He rejected my contention that I see evidence of God in things he sees as no such thing. Yet I see that evidence through experiences he obviously does not have. So if you all can affirm Quality is by nothing more than saying experience is proof, then where's the MoQ based criticism to speak against affirming God for the same reason? MP ---- "Don't believe everything you think." Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
