[Andre]
Hi Arlo, don't know why we should be 'parting ways'. I completely agree with
you. Profound, Dynamic experience CAN occur any time. I hope Platt realises
this as well.

[Arlo]
Platt fails to realize DQ is "immediate experience", and as such is the
every-present NOW moment. He fails to see this because, for him, DQ has filled
the role of a God, an external force that deliberates and orders and plans and
shapes the cosmos, and we and everything else merely respond to this Great
Force. "Qualigod". 

The next step in dealing with his statement "DQ is not everyday experience it
is rare" would be to think about the ramifications of this. If DQ only appears
to some people, under some circumstances, then the power of opening oneself to
DQ lies NOT with "us" but we become mere passive creatures waiting for DQ to
reveal itself to us, we are reduced to kneeling in a church praying for "divine
intervention".

In order for US to have the agency to be open to DQ (meaning "respond to
experience without the use of analogues"), DQ simply MUST be present in every
moment. Sure, most of the time we do respond with analogues, we are habituated
beings. But the possibility must exist at every zero-point, or else we lose
agency and become passive creatures who can only wait for DQ to bless us in
some rare moment.

This is why DQ IS everyday experience. It is the "ongoing Dynamic edge of
[ALL!] experience". And it is THIS that makes us agenic beings. It is THIS that
keeps the cosmos "alive" and not a place of unchanging stasis (to allow me a
redundancy there).

If you consider Platt's view you will see that it leads in the opposite
direction. By making DQ an external, intermittent "force", that sometimes
appears to some people, and sometimes not, and shapes and creates the world,
then all things become non-agenic, and the cosmos becomes nothing but passive
play-dough for Qualigod.

In another thread they are talking about "free will", and I contend that "free
will" is simply another word for "chance" and "probability". We have "free
will" because at every single solitary zero-moment there is the POSSIBILITY
that we act in unexpected, uncontrolled, unordered, undefined, unpredicted 
ways, and it is THAT aspect of DQ in EVERY moment that makes this so. If that
possibility did not exist at every moment of every day, and was only something
that was granted to us intermittently, on some occasions, then we would have no
"free will". 

"Chance" MUST be present at every second, in every moment of "immediate
experience". For without this "chance" (DQ) at every zero-point man could never
be free. That you can respond to this email by applauding, or crying, or
getting a beer, or burning an Arlo-effigy, or in countless unexpected ways is
testament to the fact that DQ (as "immediate experience") is there all the
time. Not "sometimes", not "now and then". ALL the time.

I am banging this hammer because I feel it is THIS that is the power of the
MOQ. If WE don't have the agency to overcome our analogues and be open to the
DQ that is present in *every single moment*, then we become servants, pawns or
sheep merely awaiting some external DQ to occasionally shine its light on us,
and the MOQ becomes "god philosophy".

And make no mistake. THAT is what Platt is arguing for.


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to