Krimel to Andre: And as I have said many times, I think it is a mistake to regard the pre-intellectual as good, as freedom. I certainly do not think the static quality is evil. In fact quite often dynamic is evil and static is the ultimate good. If you reflect on this for very long I think you will see I am right about this.
Andre, Why do you think DQ is 'evil' ? Is it because it is unknown or is it because it provides us , at every second of the day, with the opportunity to do something quite different from existing patterns? Just asking and am interested. [Krimel] I don't think DQ is 'evil' any more than I think it is 'Good'. Those terms are of a different kind than static and dynamic. Static and dynamic are value neutral terms. They are metaphysical terms in that they can be applied to any set of relationships. Good and evil are relative terms. They speak of probable outcomes among particular sets of relationships. My perceptions of good and bad are entirely about whether things are good or bad for me. Living things have evolved layers of capacity to discriminate good from bad. But discrimination, as a process requires, the ability to loop time. It requires the ability to link present circumstances to some past event and the terms themselves describe some future outcome. [Andre] PS I am sorry I cannot fully respond to your post Krimel. Health problems force me to lay low a bit at present. I am enjoying your posts. [Krimel] I'm sorry, you are feeling bad, but glad if my writing makes you feel any better. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
