Hi Arlo,

How do you distinguish Good PC from Bad PC?

Thanks,
Willblake2
On May 7, 2009, at 10:24:27 PM, "ARLO J BENSINGER JR" <[email protected]> wrote:
[WillBlake]
This attitude of yours is so far from Quality, I'm not sure what you have
learned.

[Arlo]
I've learned that you used some very distortive rhetoric several times. If you
think it'd be "Quality" of me to accept that, think again. But please, explain
to me how using distortive rhetoric several times in your replies to me is a
"Quality attitude". I'd love to hear that.

[WillBlake]
Maybe, from you, I can learn how to use hyperbole and righteous indignation to
support a way of thinking. 

[Arlo]
Can you show me some examples of where I used this in my posts to you? Because
*I* can point out several times you used some pretty distortive rhetoric.

And as if you cue...

[WillBlake]
The Dixie Chicks was done in the name of PC. What do you think of your
wonderful PC now. 

[Arlo]
Since every time *I* used the Chicks *I* pointed out it was an EVIL use of PC,
your above rhetoric is just another attrocious attempt at distortion. Since
I've said from day one; some PC good, some PC bad, some PC comical, your above
assertion is, again, kinda fucking "retarded", isn't it? I'd say anyone with
half a clue can see that.

[WillBlake]
Of course, you know what is best for all, oh wise one! 

[Arlo]
Show me where I said this, or even imply it. 

[WillBlake]
Ah, isn't it great to take others apart with your obviously superior knowledge.
I have news for you, you look foolish.

[Arlo]
I'd say since I can (and have) provided evidence to back up my pointing out
your distortive rhetoric, but all you make are empty claims, it is YOU who look
rather foolish. No?

[WillBlake]
I know you can't write a couple of paragraphs that stand on their own merit. 

[Arlo]
Really? You want me to repeat some paragraphs from my previous posts? If I do,
think you can actually answer them? Because I'd be happy to.

I know, it'd be so much easier if I'd just "baaaa" out the empty "PC is bad,
mmmkay" slogan. Sucks that this isn't the EIB network, doesn't it?

[WillBlake]
Go ahead, take me out, you weasel.

[Arlo]
Here's my challenge. You point out ANY question you asked that I left
unanswered. You point out ANY challenge I made that I did not respond directly
to, or explain in detail. You point out ANY kneejerk reaction I made in my
posts to you. You point out ANY insults or "ad hominems" I made to you. You
point out ANY place I've used distortive rhetoric. You do any of this, and you
may have a valid point. 

Because, WillBlake, I'd be happy to easily do this for all the above regarding
your posts. So if you can, please do so, if not, then save the talk-radio 
indignation for the Limbaugh crowd, I know they eat that shit up.






Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to