Arlo, We are labeling PC as good or bad. Do you believe there is a higher order, outside our experience, that is dictating what is good and what is bad?
Thanks, Willblake2 On May 8, 2009, at 8:31:39 PM, "ARLO J BENSINGER JR" <[email protected]> wrote: [WillBlake] Would you say contextual PC judgement is subjective? [Arlo] Again, if your motive is to try to force a S/O dichotomy here, I suggest your read LILA. The way I see "contextual" is in the view of the MOQ, and this has nothing to do with "subjective" or "objective". So rather than seeking an artificial "objective" rubric, and then failing at the trying twice to pin the label "subjective", my advice is to read Pirsig (or read him again, as this question shows very little understanding). For example, in ZMM Pirsig relates his experience when first asked whether Quality is objective or subjective. "Because if Quality exists in the object, then you must explain just why scientific instruments are unable to detect it. You must suggest instruments that will detect it, or live with the explanation that instruments don?t detect it because your whole Quality concept, to put it politely, is a large pile of nonsense." (ZMM) This is the trap you're aiming for, isn't it? Too bad. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
