On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:43 PM, markhsmit <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > OK, so you state that relationship is a form of time and visa versa. I > assume > what you are talking about is the relationship of before and after, and > that such a > relationship is defined in terms of time; in the absence of time we > couldn't > draw such a relationship.
According to the Biocentric model, and straight thinking, time only exists in the context of animal perception. When you state that "time is a form of relationship...", perhaps it is up to > you to explain > what you mean. > Ok, what I meant was that time exists soley as a function of animal perception - not as any sort of independent "thing". Simple, succinct and logical. I like it. John Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
