On Aug 14, 2009, at 9:46:31 AM, "John Carl" <[email protected]> wrote: From: "John Carl" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [MD] The case for an Uncreated Source Date: August 14, 2009 9:46:31 AM PDT To: [email protected] On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:43 PM, markhsmit <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > OK, so you state that relationship is a form of time and visa versa. I > assume > what you are talking about is the relationship of before and after, and > that such a > relationship is defined in terms of time; in the absence of time we > couldn't > draw such a relationship.
According to the Biocentric model, and straight thinking, time only exists in the context of animal perception. When you state that "time is a form of relationship...", perhaps it is up to > you to explain > what you mean. > Ok, what I meant was that time exists soley as a function of animal perception - not as any sort of independent "thing". Simple, succinct and logical. I like it. John Hmmm... So time does not exist outside of perception. Animal perception creates time, in fact, time is a function of it, and Time is created by experience? Are we talking about the same Time? The Time used in physics equations? If so then physics is a function of perception, and indeed any description of the world. We are set back into our heads, that's kind of Buddhist. I'm not sure if many forms of classical logic would agree with you, but it is hard to argue against. Have fun in there! Willblake2 Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ httpat://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
