John, yup, it all seems to revolve around what frame of reference you hold to.
three stooges example mo larry and curly are hanging dry wall, Mo tells curly to start nailn curly grabs a nail from the box and exclaims "hey mo! the head on this nail is on the wrong end!" Mo replies, "you idiot! .... that nail is for the other wall" .-R ----- Original Message ---- From: John Carl <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2009 3:34:51 PM Subject: Re: [MD] What is SOM? Ron] > > it, itself, is not a bona fide metaphysic. and it would be more precise to > call > what we mean by the term "subject/object metaphysics" as simply pure > objectivism. As in, the self arises in a naturalistic evolution from the objectified cosmos and is just a collection of matter and dna that is made up of stuff wherein consciousness is merely an illusion these particles of matter have obtained somehow. Yeah, that does make sense. That's the overall impression I get from the official worldview, with anything more nebulous than that assigned to world of "wacky and mystic religious experience" which is entirely subjective (and thus wrong) John Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
