Hi Marsha, You said > > As far as what is beyond all patterns, DQ or Ultimate Reality? I am quite > comfortable with indivisible, undefinable and unknowable, and the > possibility of the creation of a better pattern always available. > I say. Me too. (Effectively defining "real" as nothing that exists in itself other than that ultimate reality.)
I also agree with "most" of what Bo says (leaving science aside for now), so I would like to ask you to clarify one point where you also agree with him. You are focussing on the patterns and not the evolutionary aspects, although we agree the social to intellectual (as S/O) split arose with the Greeks, and you said > > Intellectual Level being the subject/object level, and the MoQ being a major > separation with the Intellectual Level representing a new level, a new > perspective. > This is the crux of where I have difficulty with Bo's SOL. You use the word "level" four times, but you say "the MoQ being a major separation", and then say "a new perspective". Where is this separation / perspective ? In what ? Of what ? Perhaps you could just elaborate / explain your "separation" point a little further. (with or without using the words level and/or pattern) Regards Ian On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 9:35 AM, MarshaV<[email protected]> wrote: > > Mati, Ham, > > I am flipping out with happiness, Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
