Yes, Bell's response to the EPR paper is included in the Lindley book too. Just because Einstein didn't nail it in that paper, doesn't mean his underlying concern was wrong - just difficult to present a case. As I understand it his two "identical" electrons "thought experiment" was flawed in its initial boundary conditions being impossible in reality. Easy for logicians and mathematicians to find the fault - much harder to find reality.
Sad thing is, that same soap-opera is still on a long "interval". (You probably heard me mention Dennett & greedy reductionism before ?) Regards Ian On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:08 AM, MarshaV<[email protected]> wrote: > > Ian, > > Physics professor said John Bell proved Einstein in EPR paper absolutely > wrong. I will get 'The Cartoon History of Time', it's all too interesting > not to continue the investigation. What a soap opera! And so many loose > wiggling threads to follow. Greedy reductionism? I've heard that phrase > before, maybe from dmb. > > And in Matt's book, Plato is shrinking. There's not a lot of satisfaction, > because I keep asking why did he rule supreme for so long? No answer there > either, I suppose. > > I love books. > > > Marsha Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
