Marsha 25 Sep.you wrote:
> The problem is that once you start talking about the MoQ it becomes an > intellectual static pattern of value and suffers objectification. I'm no adherer of language as the great "sinner". After it's introduction sometime in the social era (I waver here, at times I see it as the biological pattern that triggered the Q-social development) the biological sense-patterned intelligence became word-patterned. While still at the social level the internal-thinking/external-speaking distinction wasn't emphasized. Humans communicated with gods out loud or silent in many ways. Only with the intellectual level did silent language become "thinking" taking place in a compartment called mind (called "intellect" by intellect) Yet both the silent and the out-loud - as well as the written - varieties considered different from an alleged reality "out there". > On the Dynamic/static level, above the Intellectual Level, there is > only patterned experience and Dynamic experience. Yes, the MOQ is the DQ/SQ configuration, but even the MOQ must apply language-conveyed intelligence to forward its message. Bodvar Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
