Ham,
> Ham: > There is no such thing as collective consciousness. > There is only correspondent behavior to a common stimulus. > > Ron: > Tomato, To-ma-toe, one mans collective is another's > correspondence. > You pretty much say that it's a collective correspondence. > Some fine wordsmithing. You don't see the difference between a behavioral response and a conscious feeling? Common behavior can be observed in rolling stones, falling raindrops, westerly breezes, a swarm of bees, and animals at the feeding trough. Value sensibility cannot be observed. It can only be realized by the observing subject. Only physical responses can be observed. I suggest that you rethink that criticism. You can't share an experience by looking for correspondent behavior. Confusing observed behavior with conscious experience leads to a flawed epistemology. Ron: Funny, I was thinking the same thing. Is'nt it all conscious experience? Regards, Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
