Hi Andre, Bruce, Dan, Marsha
Thanks for the quote but where does that lead us?
First, he says you can't say anything about neither chaos nor DQ. But then he
does anyway, and I get the feeling you all interpret it as Bruce's slide 9, i.e.
that chaos is the opposite of DQ.
To me, it doesn't matter whether chaos is the opposite of DQ or all of Q. It
causes havoc either way. So even if I can agree it's a beautiful quote, the
ramifications to the MoQ is (as I explained in an earlier post), well, chaos. :)
Don't you see that?
Magnus
On 2010-01-06 05:30, Andre Broersen wrote:
Marsha to Bruce:
... I cannot think that quality is opposed to chaos. There is only Quality.
Andre:
Hi Marsha, Bruce, Magnus.
I think Annotation 99 may throw some light upon this issue:
'Dynamic Quality and chaos are both patternless, and so it would seem
they have a lot in common, particularly the fact that you can't say
anything about them without getting into static patterns. But if you
do, you can say that Dynamic Quality is good and precedes static
improvement. It is the source of experience. Chaos, by contrast is the
condition of total destruction. You can't call it either good or bad.
It is not the source of anything'.
Regards
Andre
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
