Heh, somewhat true. But, aw, isn't there still space for a 50 word comment on a 3000 word diarrheatic explusion? Even if I can't help dropping 50 clips in a Mach 10 spray, I've seen people hit bull's-eyes with single arrows in response.
p.s. Nice on the ignoring of the "shift, page down, delete." > Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:14:29 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [MD] A Suggestion for Horse > > I support this (the idea of separating chat-paced discussion from > other dialogue) > > Ironically, I was about to comment on one of Matt's latest blog posts > on "conversation", but gave up, because Matt's idea of conversation > involves trading 3000 word essays ;-) > > Each to his own (as Matt said). > Regards > Ian > > > > Oh, and there's another rule I wish people would have > > some respect for: > > > > 4) Members should reproduce only the relevant parts of any previous message > > to which they > > are responding. > > > > I mean, seriously, how hard is it to shift, page down, delete. > > _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390707/direct/01/ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
