Jeez, The idea that celebrity (or any static pattern) might cloud one's judgement was the no-brainer the primary assertion, given that ... , etc (agreeing is good but not necessary). The point was ...
Pirsig understands this. Dawkins doesn't get it. (See the finger painting thread.) Ian On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 3:36 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > Andre, > > All (in the conventional sense) static patterns of value cloud ones > judgement. Would you disagree, or state it differently? > > Marsha > > > > On Jan 22, 2010, at 9:22 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > >> Marsha to Ian: >> Missed your point, but you set me straight. So now happy we agree. >> >> Andre: >> I know my internet connection is bad so I may have missed a few issues >> of posts: what are you two agreeing on? That celebrity clouds your >> judgement? >> >> The patterns holding the 'celebrity' clouds judgement about what? The >> patterns? The mirrors? The reflections? What? >> >> Andre >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > > > _______________________________________________________________________ > > Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars... > > > > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
