[Arlo] > Final comment... So long as you have > the freedom to choose, some probability must exist for each choice. > If you eliminate that probability, then there is not a choice.
1) I chose vanilla ice cream 2) If I wanted I could have chosen broccoli ice cream 3) I didn't want to choose broccoli ice cream 4) Nothing forced me to chose vanilla ice cream 5) :. I freely chose vanilla ice cream Do I need this additional premise?: 3.5) there is some probability I would want to choose broccoli ice cream. Given premise 3), I don't see where premise 3.5) plays any role in my reasoning. You might say 3) entails 3.5), but what would that argument be? [Arlo] > red-bean ice-cream...Delicious! I order it every time... You might have something there. The vanilla bean itself is dark brown. [ Andre] > my summary and ask you to respond ( unless you consider > this thread to be a dead end) > Steve's [/Craig's also?] position seems to be: freedom is expressed > in the choice of that which is given...the broccoli icecream or something > else. > Arlo's position seems to be: freedom is experiencing that which has > not been given...yet. A thread is never dead...dying, maybe. I will try to respond if you explain & give examples of what "being given" is? Craig Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
