On 23 Feb 2010 at 7:18, X Acto wrote: > > > On 23 Feb 2010 at 6:39, X Acto wrote: > > > Platt, Bodvar, > > Then both of you assert that > > MoQ IS "being" and that the > > intellectual level IS > > The belief "that the principles > > of mathematics are the principles > > of all things." > > Platt: > Huh? Sorry, Ron. I don't get your point. What's the difference between > "being" and "is?" What are the "principles of math?" > > Ron: > "being" = existing. The term "MoQ" equates to existing or "being" > or being alive.
Yes. The essence of MOQ is being, existence, the Big Self. . > The intellectual level is: > The belief "that the principles of mathematics are the principles of all > things." > or the belief that nature follows the same axioms and laws that mathematics do > or more accurately,mathmatics is an extension of natural inorganic and > biological > laws. If you want an explaination of specific mathematical axioms I would be > happy > to list some. Well, I'm mathematically challenged. But I believe Quality is beyond the realm of mathematics and logic because the MOQ includes the conceptually unknown. Further, mathematics and logic are limited by the Incompleteness Theorem. Finally, the relationship between math and nature is happily coincident because both are creations of DQ, i.e. intelligent awareness. Does this make any sense to you? Regards, Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
