dave,
u are sounding a little mccarthy like...(theist replacing communist)
as i am sure you know - humility is the key that opens the door
you know i love ya
g

--- On Sat, 27/2/10, david buchanan <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: david buchanan <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [MD] Pragmatically useful Religion
> To: [email protected]
> Received: Saturday, 27 February, 2010, 9:14 AM
> 
> 
> dmb said to Ron:
> .., there are lots of philosophical reasons for rejecting
> theism and it's not just a coincidence that they overlap
> with the reasons for rejecting SOM. But apparently there are
> people who think theism is somehow a better option than
> scientific materialism and because Pirsig rejects scientific
> materialism, they imagine they'll find some comfort in the
> MOQ, some sympathy for their theism. The philosophical
> mysticism might make it look even more tempting to a theist,
> but those sections of Lila are actually where we find the
> MOQ's most elaborate anti-theistic arguments. I really don't
> think it can be done. Given all that, it seems to me that
> trying to squeeze an endorsement of theism out of Pirsig's
> isn't just incorrect, it's also kinda sleazy.
> 
> 
> John said:
> 
> You know what's sleazy Dave?  That thing you talked
> about in a previous post - that "projection" thing that you
> alluded to.  Demonizing, is another good term. 
> Construing demons in your own head to have an external
> reality in others that you then fight like hell (!) against.
> ...I personally have no idea if God really exists apart from
> my own ideas, but I do know my own ideas exist. ...Somehow
> your reassurance that you know everything there is to be
> known on the subject and thus can reject my ideas, 
> rings hollow to me.  If you came across as a little
> more intelligent, a little more thoughtful, I'd be inclined
> to pay attention, ..But this continual flailing against the
> windmills of your own mind would be just boring if it wasn't
> so antagonistic. Since it is antagonistic, and directed
> against your own self, it's kind of interesting but also a
> little pathetic.
> 
> 
> 
> dmb says:
> 
> Why sir, I do believe that is the e-mail equivalent of a
> temper tantrum. It's a wonder that you could operate a
> keyboard, what with all the kicking and screaming and
> spitting and flailing your arms about. Jeez.
> 
> I wasn't even talking to you, man. You probably figured I
> was talking about you and that's fair enough. I guess you'd
> probably count as one who has tried to "squeeze an
> endorsement of theism out of Pirsig" but my comments were
> directed to Ron and they referred to just about every theist
> that ever showed up here.
> 
> I'll take your ranting, raving denial as an admission of
> guilt. Obviously, a nerve has been struck by complaints
> about theists with an agenda and so I figure you must be one
> of them.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     
>         
>           
>   
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM
> protection.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469226/direct/01/
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 


      
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to