On 3/2/10 10:22 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be an idea to read > the f..ing "manual"? [Bible?] This whole exercise reminds me of those Gospel stories. Except with them there is at least the excuse that the writing was turned out well after the fact by many different people. It is becoming more clear to me why some philosophers have said, other than from a historical sense, the whole philosophy project is over. Even those who feel that this is premature are skeptical of the value of metaphysics as anything other than a placeholder for those ideas that are untestable and will forever remain that way. Metaphysically the following statements are identical: The source of all reality is God. The source of all reality is Quality. The source of all reality is Zxpygw. Dogma are dogma. Whether metaphysical or religious does it really make any difference? But it is somewhat interesting to see a "religion" in the making in at close to real time. The Gospel of Bo is being promoted by the "if you can't pound on the facts, pound on the pulpit" method that all "good" Pentecostal preachers adore. The Gospel of DMB uses that reasoned, intellectual approach favored by the Presbyterians. The Gospel of DLT is some form a agnosticism that even he can't understand. The nice thing about the process is that you can make it up as you go along. Nobody has yet figure out the big MoQ religious question yet: "How do you get others to send you money?" Just hope being here doesn't mean I signed up for the poisoned Kool-Aid. Reverently yours, Dave Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
