On Mar 22, 2010, at 5:43 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Hi Marsha > > Sun Mar. 21 > > Bo before (to DMB): >>> Yes, DQ is the dynamic aspect - the cutting edge, immediate >>> experience - if you prefer. And yes, it's prior to language (as a social >>> pattern) because it's prior to all static levels, the point is that >>> Quality/Concepts does NOT correspond to the DQ/SQ. > > Marsha: >> I agree with you, concepts do not correspond to static quality, although >> static patterns would seem to include concepts. Or do you disagree with >> this? > > I agree absolutely with this and no "but", just let me expand a little on > things in general. The MOQ's first axiom is "Reality is Quality". > However, dynamic and static are mere different forms of quality (like > ice and liquid are of water) thus this axiom can safely be expanded to > say: "Reality is DQ/SQ" This way the destructive "Quality//DQ/SQ > meta-metaphysics is avoided and all these mind-boggling buchanan > exercises are left nil and void. > >> I think there's no way of confining static patterns to this or that. > > I guess you mean "dynamic"? Anyway the MOQ says that reality is this > dynamic/static interaction, thus the MOQ itself is neither dynamic or > static because it IS the realization of this context. It will certainly > evolve > and expand - we are already in the process of doing so - but the > fundamental DQ/SQ constellation will remain lest it all turns absurd. > > > Bodvar >
Hi Bo, Yes, I see it exactly as you state it. Reality is Quality(DQ/sq), or better stated from my humble point-of-view: Reality is Quality(unpatterned experience/ patterned experience.) Reality once was subjects and objects, but now it's Quality. Marsha Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
