Ham, You are correct.
Marsha On Mar 31, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Ham Priday wrote: > Hi Marsha -- > > >> How about 'objective point-of-view', or, not to be nit-picky, >> are you looking for definition that is essentially yours? > > "Objective point of view" is fine; but a POV should not be regarded as an > "attitude". It's a worldview -- a particular way of conceptualizing reality. > > No, Marsha, I'm not trying to push my own definitions or terminology on the > MoQ. However, where there is a legitimate difference between the MoQ and > Essentialism, I want to be able to explain it in terms that will be > understood here. All too often "special connotations" make this difficult. > > In pursuit of clarity, > Ham > > ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
