[Steve] > One of these usually unstated ought-premises > that accompanies any set of is-premises in an inquiry is that one > under discussion which says that we ought not derive any new "oughts" > by considering only a set of is-premises.
This is never a premise--that would be begging the question. [Steve] > we also could never derive a > new "is" from a set of is-premises alone. Nothing is easier: Socrates is a man. A man is mortal. :. Socrates is mortal. Craig Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
