DMB, I said: > This is not to say that radical empiricism may not do anything extra > for you in terms of metaphysics, it is just that it doesn't do > anything for you in terms epistemology that we can't have in other > ways.
Steve: Let me and that one thing that radical empiricism is quite good for is critiquing traditional "sense impression" empricism as not being empirical enough. As a form of anti-foundationalism it is good stuff. But when it gets reasserted later as a quasi-foundation for supporting epistemology it is either useless or a step backward into foundationalism. Best, Steve Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
