dmb,
I've explained these things many times, check the archives. (Isn't that the way you handle it? ) Marsha On Apr 30, 2010, at 10:35 PM, david buchanan wrote: > > Thanks Marsha. > Your are very good at evading responsibility for your statements and views so > your posts are mildly interesting, but not in a good way. > > dmb > > >> From: [email protected] >> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:09:27 -0400 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [MD] Reading & Comprehension >> >> >> dmb, >> >> I certainly do not consider your mean-spirited posts interesting. You are >> very good, though, at posting quotes. >> >> >> Marsha >> >> >> >> >> >> On Apr 30, 2010, at 3:57 PM, david buchanan wrote: >> >>> >>> Andre said to Marsha: >>> ... I care about the MOQ and about Mr. Pirsig's accomplishments. >>> >>> >>> Marsha replied: >>> >>> The known is an ever-changing, interrelated, impermanent, relative static >>> pattern of value. I see no reason to be too concerned with something that >>> will, even for you, be changing and is impermanent. >>> >>> Pirsig says: >>> "Quality is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.., but a metaphysics >>> can be none of these things. A metaphysics must be divisible, definable and >>> knowable, or there isn't any metaphysics." >>> >>> Marsha, you are defining static patterns as if they were NOT static or >>> patterned. Don't you see how that confuses static and dynamic? >>> >>> >>> And let me ask you about the Pirisg quotes you provided as a response to >>> the annotations wherein Pirsig says Bo's theory undermines the MOQ. How do >>> you figure they are relevant? Both of those quotes, in fact, describe the >>> difference between static and dynamic, the very categories you have >>> confused above. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Marsha said to Andre: >>> >>> >>> To you, I may seem confused. I know of no reason why that should concern >>> me. >>> >>> >>> >>> dmb says: >>> >>> You should be concerned because if he is right, then you are confused. Who >>> wants to be confused? If you're only saying that you don't care about >>> Andre's opinion, then you're just rude and shame on you. But if you're >>> saying you don't care about whether or not you're confused, then you're >>> basically confessing that you're an unreasonable person. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _________________________________________________________________ >>> The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your e-mail accounts with >>> Hotmail. >>> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multiaccount&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_4 >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives: >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> Moq_Discuss mailing list >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >> Archives: >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html > > _________________________________________________________________ > The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3 > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
