On May 18, 2010, at 5:13 PM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote: > [Marsha] > Passive? If you think changing perspective is easy, good for you. How did it > happen for you? > > [Arlo] > ?? I meant that the relationship between individual/collective is not passive; > i.e. the community changes alongside the individual.
Marsha Agree :-) > [Marsha] > Oh right, and that approach has been working soooo well in the West... > > [Arlo] > I don't know how it can work any other way. I don't think I want to live in a > world where one person, or all people, can change the community at whim. But > this just the static/dynamic barrier on the social level. I think we may agree > that at times historically (now?) static filters become too cemented, but I > think we need them. Balance. Marsha: Any relationship between one person and all people is a relationship of patterns. I can skip the balance, and wish for a massive awakening from 'things (truths) are absolute' to 'patterns (truths) are relative'. That would be fine by me. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
