Ham, superb post , I agree on all of it, Pirsig , Huxley,and strangely but thrue also your conclusions and abstractions , problem is this , ik can think of it all in my language and in this context, but i i want to typ it , the words just don't come.
I agree , especially on Pirsigs huxley insight. And i furthermore strongly agree on your statement not to pursue to an endless level the DQ/SQ/truth/valuetrain. because of a reason, of course, not to become nicheproducts in our own niche, trying to explain the workingprinciples of a color v to a mice, or the layout of a computer to a bacteria,but missing the point entirely that , by adding properties, the original intrinsic properties are in fact , downscaled to a lesser property. This is where Pirsig Broke free, not allowing to define boundarys for Quality,desintegrating Quality by adding propertys. MoQ! without definitions. like your post , Ham! Adrie Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
