On Jun 24, 2010, at 5:59 PM, Ham Priday wrote: > > If "subject-object metaphysics" is intended to mean the perception of reality > as a pluralistic system whose physical components evolve and move in orderly > fashion, it is the physical world we all experience, not "metaphysics". How > can any philosophy be "opposed to" experience or existence? Even a > metaphysical thesis that transcends space/time existence (definitely not the > MOQ) cannot be "opposed" to it.
Hi Ham, Does this work? Subject-object metaphysics reflects the view that reality is made of inherently existing self and objects, and an individuals thoughts, being ephemeral (ever- changing, relational, unbounded, impermanent), are not real. This view, though, is a learned set of conceptual attributes overlaid onto experience. The MoQ is not opposed to experience, but the SOM definition. Marsha Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
