On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:16 AM, Andre Broersen <[email protected]>wrote:
> : > > Yes, about static quality but not about the MOQ itself...Mr. Pirsig has > clearly indicated some limits to how to interpret the MOQ. He has made this > clear especially in the Annotations. He has said openly that Platt's and > Bodvar's interpretation 'undermines' the MOQ. > > No. He said Platt's conclusion -- "The MOQ is the best S/O answer I've found yet." -- undermines the MOQ, meaning by emphasizing the necessary use of S/O language to convey the MOQ its "essence" may be compromised, reducing its value. Platt. > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
