On Jun 28, 2010, at 12:17 PM, Andre Broersen wrote: > Marsha to Andre: > > I originally responded to Arlo's social rhetoric, Since you have chosen to > strip away Arlo's part of the communication, I respond in like: > > Andre: > I suggest you follow up on Arlo's suggestion if this is all you can muster > from you SOL/SOM intellectual capacity. > > You are re-confirming the loop which you suggest I uphold. Go meditate Marsha. >
Hello Andre, What Loop? Here's where you first reference 'loop': On Jun 28, 2010, at 5:15 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > > Andre to Marsha: > I have suggested it: the MOQ (DQ/sq). > Mr. Pirsig himself has suggested several. There is Yin/Yang, Form and > formlessness. Others on this list have presented them. I mean, you are just > going in loops all the time. > All I am waiting for is that you reject them because they do not meet up with > your criteria, and the loop continues. Marsha p.s. btw: Where is that yin/yang reference you cite as RMP's suggestion? ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
