Bo, I'll just respond to you concluding summary, you said > > Hope you understand my long-winded expounding above. SOM was > "amoral" in the traditional moral sense, but in the MOQ where > everything is moral the picture changes fundamentally, it's the highest > static morality. >
Let me get this right. (No argument historically, as we've agreed before.) You are saying that same Good Old Fashioned amoral SOMist Intellect IS the highest static morality - now and forever. What did MoQ bring to the party then (other than installing SOM in that supreme position) ? Hadn't the Greeks and later the enlightenment already done that - not exactly amoral, but above all other moral considerations. Whatever your commitment to the idea .... you cannot fail to see why every MoQist should reject it. Ian Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
