> > Platt:
> > Not sure what you have in mind, but if you mean that value transcends SOM
> > intellect I agree.
> >
> > Ron:
> > This is where the interpretive factor gets kinda sticky. If one takes the
>tack
>
>
> > of
> > SOM= the intellectual level, then no. Because it can't. It contradicts it's
>own
>
> >
> > assertion.
> > SOM is the highest static good and the four levels is all there is. If one
> does
> > take that value transcends the intellectual level then all sorts of twisted
> > rationalized arguements arise to support this assertion. It becomes
> > indestinguishable
> > from religous rationalized arguements. It becomes a destroyer of the
> > intellectual level.
> > It seeks to kill all intellectual patterns. The highest good mind you per
>SOL.
> > The intellect commits suicide looking to transcend to some rationalized
state
> > thats is indefinable. Sounds like a religion.
>
> [Platt]
>
> Well then you're going to have to deal intellectually with DQ which is
> indefinable. Does acknowledging the existence of that creative force destroy
> intellectual patterns? Does Pirsig rely on some religious-type miracle to
> round
>
> out his metaphysics?
>
> What say you?
>
>
> Ron:
> SOL seems to answer "yes".
[Platt]
You say otherwise?
Ron:
I believe Pirsig says otherwise.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
