Hi Bo, On 12 Jul 2010 at 18:20, [email protected] wrote:
Platt, Dan, All. 8 July. Platt had said: > > The MOQ escapes the intellectual level by including within its > > system of understanding that, "Thought is not a path to > > reality,".a direct contradiction of intellectual values. Right, the 4th level is a MOQ subset and the MOQ cannot fit inside even if the "weak interpreters" try their best. It will always leave a part uncovered (like trying to wrap an article in a too small paper) "Thought is not a path to reality ...etc." Great, in what context did you find that? Hi Bo, This is from Chapter 5 of Lila where Pirsig discusses the mystic's objections to a written metaphysics. He went ahead anyway but included in the MOQ a critical element that is "too obscure for existing language," i.e., outside the intellectual level. Unless one acknowledges the indispensable role of DQ which cannot be defined and is thus non-intellectual, one's understanding of the MOQ is weak indeed. Best, Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
