On Aug 8, 2010, at 7:46 PM, ARLO J BENSINGER JR wrote: > > [Arlo] > I am not the one confusing the Metaphysics of Quality with Quality itself, for > that you need look no further than Bo. And YOU make this same confusion above. > > To fix it, you should say... Its the way we first come to konw it; and, as > we've all been saying in various ways again and again, the MOQ is an > intellectual 'description' of Quality itself. > > See? No confusion. The way you had written it, the "Metaphysics of Quality" is > confused with "Quality" itself. As I said to both Marsha and Bo, you are > confusing the undefined (Quality) with Pirsig's attempt at a definition (the > Metaphysics of Quality).
Marsha: I might agree with you that it is all analogy, including every sentence you've written. Not this, not that!!! This makes it very easy to dismiss your rhetoric too. ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
