Hi Dan
"Dan Glover" <[email protected]> wrote:
>The MOQ states that reality can be sorted into four evolutionary
>levels. That's all there is. The BOC, on the other hand, uses 64
>hexagrams to describe reality. Since we cannot possibly map "all there
>is" in a 1:1 format, the BOC as well as the MOQ must predominately use
>analogy and metaphor to describe "all there is."
I think your conclusion here is a bit premature. Why must we use analogy and
metaphor? Why not just use the levels? They can be defined without analogy or
metaphor more or less as Pirsig describes in Lila.
> The MOQ is a map that
>describes the territory. It is not the territory itself. How could it
>be? Reality shifts and changes constantly. As soon as we nail it down,
>poof, it is gone.
That only serves to show that reality is dynamic. And of course we can't make a
complete map of reality, but the levels are not a map, they are the legend that
explains the symbols on the map.
Magnus
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
