Hi Horse, In fairness to Bo, I think it was in this case and often is the case that some other forum member decides that a particular thread presents an opportunity to demonstrate how ridiculous SOL is. Such people may be equally at fault for hijacking threads and are equally responsible to start a new thread when they wish to change the topic.
Thanks, for you intervention. Best, Steve On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Horse <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, and before anyone starts giving me a hard time about the content below > or playing silly mind games, this has all been covered before. > It's not censorship and I, and just about everyone else on this list, have > no fear about the SOL interpretation or anything to do with it. > Apart from 4, possibly 5, list members, no-one on this mailing list is in > the least bit interested in how the SOL relates to any aspect of the MoQ. So > it is just good manners that Bo (and others) that want to interject with > comments regarding SOL in a thread that has nothing to do with SOL should > change the subject heading. > > Horse > > On 14/08/2010 20:02, Horse wrote: >> >> Hi Steve >> >> Yes I agree with you that Bo should not hijack threads with his SOL >> interpretation - it's very easy to start another thread and it would be >> appreciated if you would do so. There is also this creeping in: >> >> On 14/08/2010 16:13, [email protected] wrote: >>> >>> I knew Arlo or someone else from the orthodox school would zoom in >>> on exactly that point. Like in the "intellect creating a social >>> nightmare" >>> where Pirsig saw the implications and hastily added "SOM-as-intellect" >>> (which if replaced by the "socialist" MOQ would create peace and >>> harmony) >> >> which I have asked Bo to keep out of discussions. >> >> Bo, as I've said in the past Pirsig does not support "SOM-as-Intellect" so >> please do not start down this road again. I've noticed you making these type >> of references in the recent past and thought we had agreed that you would >> refrain from this. >> >> Horse >> >> >> On 14/08/2010 16:53, Steven Peterson wrote: >>> >>> Hi Horse, >>> >>> I've made the request in the past that if people want to discuss SOL >>> b.s. that they should at east start a new thread (preferably with some >>> clear label like "SOLBS" so I and like-minded others know not to >>> bother reading it) rather than hijacking another thread. If you see >>> fit, I would appreciate it if you would lend your administrative >>> weight to my request. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Steve >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org >>> Archives: >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html >>> >> > > -- > > "Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production > deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid." > — Frank Zappa > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
