Hi Dave, I think your quote may be in the Copleston Annotation:
"The MOQ is not opposed to materialism as long is it is understood that materialism is a set of ideas." Marsha On Aug 15, 2010, at 11:52 AM, David Thomas wrote: > Marsha, > >> I'm not getting your indignation... > > That's because I'm not indignant. What you believe is what you believe. > > Your original post says: > >> You criticize Bo's point-of-view, yet from your other post you talk about >> human animals and the evolution. The MoQ is not about human >> animals, but static patterns of value, and the evolution that the MoQ >> references is the evolution of static patterns of value. > > If I had to characterize a philosophical POV that is closest to mine it > would be pragmatic philosophical realism. > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_realism > > Somewhere that I can't find right now I believe that Pirsig suggested that > the MoQ subscribes to some form of realism. Your statement "The MoQ is not > about human animals" denies the most basic claims of philosophical realism. > So your views of reality, and the MoQ, and mine share so little common > ground that any discussion would be more like a discussion of religion, than > philosophy. > > That is all that I was trying to convey. > > Dave > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
