Not really. I think it would just give more credence to those that
complain that Pirsigs MoQ is lumped in with cults and similar. You just
need to take a look at Hubbards book on Dianetics!
Personally I can't see what's wrong with ordinary English, written well.
Of course, we might have to spend some time defining the terminology of
the MoQ but that's just part and parcel of writing well and with a
particular audience in mind - i.e. ordinary and inquisitive folk who can
read and use a dictionary in an emergency.
I think the biggest stumbling block we've had in expressing even the
basics of the MoQ is using particular words inappropriately - and I
would even accuse Pirsig of this as well. Atoms are not intelligent! I
don't even think they're particularly clever.
Horse
On 18/08/2010 13:00, Ian Glendinning wrote:
Does anyone see value in working towards a MOQish language ?
--
"Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines
or dates by which bills must be paid."
— Frank Zappa
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
