There you go again, Krimel. As if it were technology issue. As if it were a matter of knowing how to use a delete button. I use it every time, actually. I should probably start using it on you as well as Marsha. As a matter of fact, this was just a little test. I wanted to see who would respond fairly like a reasonable person and who would simply take sides for some unreasonable reason. Jesus, do you even know how to stop the bullshit from flowing out of your pen? Can you even tell the difference anymore?
If you're right, then I only have a problem with 17 empty, nasty, unphilosophical posts before lunch BECAUSE - and this is where your tough-minded, empirically-based, scientifically supported reason comes in - because technology gives me fits so much that I can't even use a delete key. If I follow your reasoning, nobody should have a problem with rush hour traffic. It's only a problem if you're so freaked out by mechanical devices that you don't know how to use your breaks, right? Only an inept driver would complain about traffic, right? Wrong. Obviously, the problem is having to use the delete button or having to use your breaks TOO MUCH. Either way, it's not good to clog things up and no reasonable person thinks otherwise. And don't flatter yourself, Krimel. There's nothing artistic about your bullshit. It only makes you look dishonest and immature and I'm throughly sick of it. I am not at all surprised that you failed my little test but I'm surprised at how badly you failed. I thought there were only two basic options; "yes, I have a problem with that" OR "no, Marsha can do that all day long if she wants". Somehow you managed to find a third option that was even worse than the worst option. You not only failed to address the actual complaint, you made it all about the complainer AND based that switch on a completely implausible assertion; If I knew more about computer technology there would be no reason to complain. I'm just spelling this out so you might realize how transparently bogus this is, how silly and empty it is. I could spent a lot of time spelling out your stuff but that kind of task is fun only in small doses. It's easy to see what you're doing. It takes no time at all to see right through it, but taking the time to spell it out in print is quite another thing. So I usually don't bother. I mean, you need to realize unimpressive and unpersuasive this is. Don't let Marsha's flattery delude you, dude. This is weak, weak stuff and so are your straw men. > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:37:05 -0400 > Subject: Re: [MD] Tossing Coins or The Dervish's Deed > > dmb, > Not me. > Why would that be a problem for anyone. > Adrie has Unicode issues so that might interfere with his delete key but > WTF? > I know technology gives you fits but sheesh.... > Krimel > > > > Dear MOQers: > > By my accounting, it's just after 11 in the morning and Marsha has already > posted 17 times. That would be obnoxious no matter who did it and it would > still be annoying even if the content was completely worthy of attention. > > But in this case we are talking about 17 empty, nasty, unphilosophical posts > before lunch. > > Anybody else have a problem with that? > > > > > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
