Hi Adrie
On 2010-08-25 20:47, ADRIE KINTZIGER wrote:
I was only joking about chaos Krimel_o ,you look and feel sensitive today.
don't bother with the order or chaotic order, things mostly only appear to
be chaotic, like this program
Andy provided, the real case was not raging against the presented case , but
looking into the case to solve the case.
and Magnus is wright, i looked into the module again, and in fact it is all
the formulating work of Pirsig on SQ/DQ,
Quality , written out in machinecode.
It seems to be done by a preffesser-informationspecialist, a very logical
thinker, because there is no unnessesity in the
programming either , it is written very strict, and yes; we can safely
conclude that the module is the digital version of
the Dynamic/static/Quality formula........the machine adopts Darwins
evolution, and evolution to evolve within itself
on top of the box, ....pulsing, thicking...for quality.
Feels good to read that. Sometimes it feels as if I'm imagining things
here, not many see things the way I do. Thanks Adrie.
Very strange that Andy tossed this thread in without further comment or
tips, probably to find some fuckers that
are clever enough to recognize the searchstring for quality, and digitalised
quality.
It seems Andy is like the Swedes up north. They don't say much, but when
they do, it's wise to listen.
Magnus ,...do you have a background of science or math or electronics?
clearly you are a very logical thinker.?
Some electronics during military service, then computer science. Been
working with software design for 15 years.
Magnus
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
