@ both static and dynamic functions.
The formation of semi-permeable cell walls to let food in and keep poisons out is a static latch. So are bones, shells, hide, fur, burrows, clothes, houses, villages, castles, rituals, symbols, laws and libraries. All of these prevent evolutionary degeneration. On the other hand, the shift in cell reproduction from mitosis to meiosis to permit sexual choice and allow huge DNA diversification is a Dynamic advance. So is the collective organization of cells into metazoan societies called plants and animals. So are sexual choice, symbiosis,death and regeneration, communality, communication, speculative thought, curiosity and art. Most of these, when viewed in a substance-centered evolutionary way are thought of as mere incidental properties of the molecular machine. But in a value-centered explanation of evolution they are close to the Dynamic process itself, pulling the pattern of life forward to greater levels of versatility and freedom. @ close to the Dynamic process itself. And pulling, versatility and freedom. Sometimes a Dynamic increment goes forward but can find no latching mechanism and so fails and slips back to a previous latched position. Whole species and cultures get lost this way. Sometimes a static pattern becomes so powerful it prohibits any Dynamic moves forward. In both cases the evolutionary process is halted for a while. But when it's not halted the result has been an increase in power to control hostile forces or an increase in versatility or both. @ slips back and prohibits. Increase in power to control hostile forces. The increase in versatility is directed toward Dynamic Quality. @ increase in versatility is directed toward DQ. The increase in power to control hostile forces is directed toward static quality. Without Dynamic Quality the organism cannot grow. Without static quality the organism cannot last. Both are needed. @ increase in power to control hostile forces is directed toward static quality. DQ and grow, static quality and last. @ dynamic subatomic forces, not DQ. @ balanced mechanism. @ steer to all sorts of freedom. @ dynamic carbon bonding. @ Dynamic force invented two molecules. try everything. @ reciprocates. @ both static and dynamic functions. @ close to the Dynamic process itself. And pulling, versatility and freedom. @ slips back and prohibits. Increase in power to control hostile forces. @ increase in versatility is directed toward DQ. @ increase in power to control hostile forces is directed toward static quality. DQ and grow, static quality and last. Trying to condense this: dynamic force invents static and dynamic functions. Versatility, try everything, freedom is close to the dynamic process, but not the process. Hostile forces are not identified but are a threat. This would imply non hostile forces that are not a threat. This may leave us with the following: Dynamic force is both hostile and non hostile. We can not say which. It is the static and dynamic functions that create what is hostile and what is not hostile. The dynamic use what is non hostile, and the static provides protection from the hostile. However, the dynamic force invented both the static function and the dynamic function, so there is a bias toward evolution away from the hostile. DQ seems to be hostile but just a little bit more non hostile. This implies an innate tendency toward betterness. And that innate tendency can not be Dynamic in the sense that it is there prior to evolution? Ade Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
