Hello Ade: On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:40 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > [Platt} > Such as "Some things are better than others." > > Hello Platt, > This is very interesting. I had not thought of this as a pattern before. > I'm not sure if this is a pithy remark so you may have to explain. I was > hoping for a bit more depth when thinking about being able to change well. > I'll let Pirsig add a bit more depth: "Here Quality succeeds where Bradley’s Absolute and Hegel’s Being and the Buddhist Nothingness and the Hindu Oneness and the theists’ God and Allah and you-name-it; all of them fail. For quality, no faith is required because there is no way you can disbelieve that there is such a thing as quality. You cannot conceive of or live in a world in which nothing is better than anything else." As for archetypes, you'll have to ask someone more familiar with Jung than me. Regards, Platt > Something occurred to me as i was thinking about this. > It's Out of the Blue and it is what it is. > It occurred to me that if Archetypes are a useful way of understanding > experience, the the moq itself will display Archetypal characteristics. > > > As i thought about this i was surprised to realise the following. > The moq has DQ and sq. > sq has four levels. > Each level has two functions, the static and the dynamic. > > > So it goes 2, 4, 8 which is a geometric progression. It's also Archetypal. > As i say, it is what it is. > But there is a parallel with Jung's personality types and what i consider > to be his metaphysics. > > > Thanks Platt, > Ade > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
