Ron, yes this morning i am loving you ...
Marsha On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:45 PM, X Acto wrote: > static quality is what we mean when we say we know stuff > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: John Carl <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Sun, August 29, 2010 11:49:52 AM > Subject: [MD] SQ is the illusion > > People talk about DQ like its so mysterious and ineffable, but really it's > SQ that's completely incomprehensible and mysterious. Nothing is really > static, but it all seems like it is in the moment. What's up with that? > Underlying substance is more unreal than real. Patterns only exist in a > constantly shifting cosmos, with everything always in flux from moment to > moment. Static? What's static? > > According to Magnus, the one and zeros of a machine. The cold, rational > precision of logic. That is, our own rational systems. But these are > unreal. The real world pulls plugs, zaps with cosmic rays and turns to rust > in time. > > Meanwhile, the ongoing Quality which causes us to create the world in our > heads, it's so plain and obvious and unchanging. So unmysterious and > evident. > > But everybody wants to believe that SQ exists. They want to feel that > reality is stable. Even though we know it's not. What is it with you > people and your static cling? ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
